Skip to content
ToolHuboBetter tools. Clearer decisions.

Inside a review

Our Review Method

Understand the evidence and criteria behind a recommendation.

How to read a review

A hands-on review should identify the model, tasks, conditions, observations, and limits. A research-based evaluation should identify the sources and criteria used. When a review uses both methods, it should distinguish direct observations from sourced findings.

What we compare

Useful criteria include fit for the job, compatibility, ease of use, maintenance, and cost. The criteria should match the product and the intended reader.

What the evidence can show

Where an article reports measurements or photos, describe how they were collected. Explain gaps in the evidence and identify relevant purchase, loan, gift, or sponsorship arrangements.

Reading the evidence

Hands-on testing

Look for the exact model, tasks, conditions, observations, and limitations. Photos or measurements should relate to the work described.

Research-based evaluation

Look for primary sources, model-specific specifications, comparison criteria, and a clear account of any evidence gaps.

Combined evaluation

Look for a distinction between direct observations and information drawn from other sources.

Details that matter in this field

Look for the exact tool model, attachment, material, power source, and task. A practical observation needs enough detail to understand the conditions.

People. Purpose. Evidence.

Get to know the work.